Reviewing our approach to assessing merger efficiencies
- From:
- Competition and Markets Authority
- Published
- 15 January 2026
- Last updated
- 3 June 2026 — See all updates
Detail of outcome
The CMA is consulting on draft revised guidance on our approach to assessing rivalry-enhancing efficencies in merger cases. The draft revised guidance is intended to replace the text currently in paragraphs 8.2 to 8.27 of our merger assessment guidelines (which set out the CMA’s substantive approach to assessing mergers)
Original call for evidence
Summary
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) is inviting views on its approach to assessing rivalry-enhancing efficiencies in mergers.
This call for evidence is being held on another website.
This call for evidence closesran atfrom
to
Call for evidence description
The CMA has been delivering a programme of work to embed our 4Ps framework – pace, predictability, proportionality, and process – across our merger control function. In October 2025, we published updated guidance on our approach to jurisdiction and procedure, to clarify our approach to jurisdiction and global deals. In December, we published updated guidance on our approach to merger remedies.
We are now launching a review into our approach to the assessment of rivalry-enhancing efficiencies in mergers, as part of our ongoing commitment to support growth, investment, and business confidence across the UK economy.
We are seeking your views and evidence on:on the CMA’s:
theCMA’sanalytical approach to rivalry-enhancing efficiencies, including the types of evidence we consider and how we assess dynamic efficienciestheCMA’sprocess for assessing rivalry-enhancing efficiencies, including how we engage with merging parties on efficiency claims
Documents
Call for evidence
PDF, 176 KB, 11 pages
AlixPartners
PDF, 251 KB, 11 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
Balanced Economy Project
PDF, 247 KB, 3 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
BRG
PDF, 206 KB, 6 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
Centre for Competition Policy
PDF, 144 KB, 17 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
City of London Law Society
PDF, 357 KB, 11 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
Clifford Chance LLP
PDF, 234 KB, 9 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
Compass Lexecon
PDF, 269 KB, 7 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
Econic Partners
PDF, 435 KB, 7 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys at Law
PDF, 429 KB, 9 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
Freshfields LLP
PDF, 354 KB, 22 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
Friday Initiatives
PDF, 111 KB, 4 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
Frontier Economics
PDF, 525 KB, 22 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
PDF, 179 KB, 7 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
International Center for Law & Economics
PDF, 292 KB, 13 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
Linklaters LLP
PDF, 349 KB, 8 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
Paul Weiss
PDF, 426 KB, 14 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PDF, 394 KB, 14 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
Professor Carmine Ornaghi
PDF, 187 KB, 3 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
RBB Economics
PDF, 343 KB, 9 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
The Computer & Communications Industry Association
PDF, 321 KB, 6 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
UK Finance
PDF, 275 KB, 5 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
UK Private Capital
PDF, 269 KB, 7 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
VodafoneThree
PDF, 125 KB, 3 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
Share this page
The following links open in a new tab
Updates to this page
-
Responses published
-
First published.
Sign up for emails or print this page
Update history
2026-06-03 11:01
Responses published
2026-01-15 10:00
First published.